Countries
Read onlyThe customer reported an issue with delivery. In this case, the tracking information indicates delivered, but the customer did not receive the package. Because you provided sufficient information that proves order was actually received by the customer, we will not count the claim against your Order Defect Rate.
Delivered with signature.
A-to-Z closed, buyer refunded.
Doesn't count against your defect rate -- but still counts against your income right?
Another seller posted the exact same thing a few days ago. Amazon always knows how to pocket more money and make themself look good at other businesses expense....
Did you open a case? If not, do so now. If no good results, get a mod involved with your case number, they will assist since they seem to be the only good seller support personnel that work for Amazon.
If they did not return it, then open a safe-t-claim to get your money back.
Outrageous, and it's happening more and more.
When it's for large amounts, sellers should start suing the buyer and Amazon.
Not right at all. What's the point of signature required if Amazon is still going to rule in favor of the buyers. The buyer should have been required to return the item in order get a refund. That is policy.
Curious to see a mod explain why this is ok.
Hi @Seller_WAZNnMBpd99sI,
I will need to review the order so I can understand the current resolution for this A-to-Z claim. Can you provide me with the order ID here?
Tatiana
Signature confirmation used to be enough to protect you however, that does not seem to be the case any longer
I'm convinced Amazon doesn't even know what Amazon is doing in 99.9% of cases.
I went through the same exact thing a few weeks ago:
https://sellercentral.amazon.com/seller-forums/discussions/t/0c2a2c53-e56c-4263-9549-340f853e70ce?postId=e4691fd9-6073-4770-8820-d6c68f4be26a
with the same phrasing and everything
The customer encountered a delivery issue. Despite UPS making three delivery attempts, the package couldn't be delivered because the buyer's business was closed each time. The customer requested that deliveries be made to the back of the business. Ultimately, A-to-Z acknowledged the oversight and approved her claim. It's perplexing how people expect the UPS driver to thoroughly read the shipping label amid their hectic delivery schedule.
Carriers should start implementing photo proof once delivered. But I guess even then the age-old addage will apply: "wasn't me"