compliance violation for "lifetime warranty"
Mods, if a seller's product is in fact backed by a lifetime warranty, does saying so in a bullet point constitute "Product Attribute Misuse?" Because we've been hit with a policy compliance violation for ASIN B0DQFD1R57 for exactly that reason.
And when I questioned a specialist about it in case 19144268821, she repeatedly conflated warranties (which to me means "If there's a flaw in the construction of the product, or if the product stops functioning in the future for a covered reason, we'll replace it") and guarantees (which to me means "we guarantee you'll be satisfied or we'll refund your money" - which is effectively what Amazon's refund policy is).
Then she said, "after removing 'lifetime' from your warranty claim, the listing error was resolved, which indicates the system flagged this specific term combination." Does Amazon seriously want us to say "this product is backed by our warranty" without saying what the warranty is?
compliance violation for "lifetime warranty"
Mods, if a seller's product is in fact backed by a lifetime warranty, does saying so in a bullet point constitute "Product Attribute Misuse?" Because we've been hit with a policy compliance violation for ASIN B0DQFD1R57 for exactly that reason.
And when I questioned a specialist about it in case 19144268821, she repeatedly conflated warranties (which to me means "If there's a flaw in the construction of the product, or if the product stops functioning in the future for a covered reason, we'll replace it") and guarantees (which to me means "we guarantee you'll be satisfied or we'll refund your money" - which is effectively what Amazon's refund policy is).
Then she said, "after removing 'lifetime' from your warranty claim, the listing error was resolved, which indicates the system flagged this specific term combination." Does Amazon seriously want us to say "this product is backed by our warranty" without saying what the warranty is?
9 replies
Seller_LVZcgxAgZ2xBv
Could you try "lifetime guarantee"?
The meaning is basically the same, right?
Seller_4zBzdtgCyS9EI
hmm...there is never really any such thing. How does a buyer know that manufacturer is till in business 5, 10, 15 years from now.
Also, how would Amazon enforce this promise to customers years down the road?
Seller_xo4Akj7FBBnfC
In our experience, Amazon can be very rigid about where warranty language is allowed to appear. Any mention of warranty terms in bullets, titles, or descriptions might trigger a “Product Attribute Misuse” violation. Amazon appears to expect all warranty details to be entered exclusively in the Warranty Description field under Safety & Compliance.
As an aside, I’ve been a long-time customer of Volt Lighting through your direct website, and would be genuinely interested to hear about your experience selling on Amazon.
We’re a small business that chose to create separate product lines and trademarks specifically for channels like Amazon. Amazon’s overwhelming advantage in Google search means that Amazon listings—including those from knockoff brands that advertise by bidding on established competitors’ trademarks—tend to dominate organic results, often at the expense of a manufacturer’s own site.
We also learned that listing your brand on Amazon is effectively irreversible: if a manufacturer withdraws its listings, Google searches return a prominent Amazon page stating the product is “no longer available,” leading everyone to believe the supplier has gone out of business.
Between its high transaction costs, constant listing-management headaches, support deficiencies, dysfunctional product search, policy-driven return abuse, and practice of flooding your product pages with ads that divert customers to cheap overseas knock-offs, we’ve found Amazon to be a very expensive channel relative to direct sales.
Segmenting our brands has allowed us to offer pricing on our direct website that reflects its lower operating costs and has helped keep our direct channel viable so far.
Seller_LVZcgxAgZ2xBv
The contortions that this platform forces brand owners to go through.
Someone should seriously do a case study on this.