its quite frustrating that amazon has automated systems in place without anyone to be able to override them when something is tagged wrongfully
im now referring to this error below for sending more inventory
"Units of this ASIN had pending Long-Term Storage Fee charges and were removed before the LTSF charge. Your ability to send in more units of this ASIN has been limited."
amazon built their policy as follows long term storage fees + removal order = block asin from sending more inventory
that sounds pretty simply doesn't it? there is logic to it but only if someone created a removal order for that purpose, an item stopped selling or too much stock and you created a removal order to avoid those fees
do you know some people can create a removal for other reasons? well how about if i have 100 units with some long term storage fees and i removal 1 unit, does that sound like im trying to avoid fees?
do you know removal orders can be used to check samples of stock? if i can get a complaint about a product i order 1 unit to see if the complaint is valid
removal orders is simply a way for me to receive my stock back that i own instead of ordering them from another buying account and pay extra fees
why would a removal order block me from sending more inventory
now if i discovered bad stock at the fulfillment centers i can create a disposal order to dispose of them but when i get new stock why would i be restricted from sending more?
i know for myself and im sure for others as well, small amounts of long term storage fees are not issue and i dont ever remove inventory for that purpose
this is flawed, its hurting especially in the holiday season when i need to replenish and on time
creating cases with support does not help, they reply with the template they have for this topic and thats all
i would like people to chime in if they have the same issue and if someone from amazon can help with this error that makes no sense
Hi @Seller_ww5gkPJboXQwU,
Thank you for reaching out on the Seller Forums! I apologize for the frustration this has caused.
If you haven't done so already, I would encourage you to read through the following help pages for additional guidance and best practices on both aged inventory surcharges and removal orders:
That said, if you'd like me to take a further look into any of your case IDs for additional guidance, I'd be happy to do so!
Thanks again,
Jameson
Yes same issue here- it makes no sense because Amazon is already making ludicrous amounts of money off sellers who have to have them remove overstocked items because they are a measley 6 months old.
its quite frustrating that amazon has automated systems in place without anyone to be able to override them when something is tagged wrongfully
im now referring to this error below for sending more inventory
"Units of this ASIN had pending Long-Term Storage Fee charges and were removed before the LTSF charge. Your ability to send in more units of this ASIN has been limited."
amazon built their policy as follows long term storage fees + removal order = block asin from sending more inventory
that sounds pretty simply doesn't it? there is logic to it but only if someone created a removal order for that purpose, an item stopped selling or too much stock and you created a removal order to avoid those fees
do you know some people can create a removal for other reasons? well how about if i have 100 units with some long term storage fees and i removal 1 unit, does that sound like im trying to avoid fees?
do you know removal orders can be used to check samples of stock? if i can get a complaint about a product i order 1 unit to see if the complaint is valid
removal orders is simply a way for me to receive my stock back that i own instead of ordering them from another buying account and pay extra fees
why would a removal order block me from sending more inventory
now if i discovered bad stock at the fulfillment centers i can create a disposal order to dispose of them but when i get new stock why would i be restricted from sending more?
i know for myself and im sure for others as well, small amounts of long term storage fees are not issue and i dont ever remove inventory for that purpose
this is flawed, its hurting especially in the holiday season when i need to replenish and on time
creating cases with support does not help, they reply with the template they have for this topic and thats all
i would like people to chime in if they have the same issue and if someone from amazon can help with this error that makes no sense
its quite frustrating that amazon has automated systems in place without anyone to be able to override them when something is tagged wrongfully
im now referring to this error below for sending more inventory
"Units of this ASIN had pending Long-Term Storage Fee charges and were removed before the LTSF charge. Your ability to send in more units of this ASIN has been limited."
amazon built their policy as follows long term storage fees + removal order = block asin from sending more inventory
that sounds pretty simply doesn't it? there is logic to it but only if someone created a removal order for that purpose, an item stopped selling or too much stock and you created a removal order to avoid those fees
do you know some people can create a removal for other reasons? well how about if i have 100 units with some long term storage fees and i removal 1 unit, does that sound like im trying to avoid fees?
do you know removal orders can be used to check samples of stock? if i can get a complaint about a product i order 1 unit to see if the complaint is valid
removal orders is simply a way for me to receive my stock back that i own instead of ordering them from another buying account and pay extra fees
why would a removal order block me from sending more inventory
now if i discovered bad stock at the fulfillment centers i can create a disposal order to dispose of them but when i get new stock why would i be restricted from sending more?
i know for myself and im sure for others as well, small amounts of long term storage fees are not issue and i dont ever remove inventory for that purpose
this is flawed, its hurting especially in the holiday season when i need to replenish and on time
creating cases with support does not help, they reply with the template they have for this topic and thats all
i would like people to chime in if they have the same issue and if someone from amazon can help with this error that makes no sense
Hi @Seller_ww5gkPJboXQwU,
Thank you for reaching out on the Seller Forums! I apologize for the frustration this has caused.
If you haven't done so already, I would encourage you to read through the following help pages for additional guidance and best practices on both aged inventory surcharges and removal orders:
That said, if you'd like me to take a further look into any of your case IDs for additional guidance, I'd be happy to do so!
Thanks again,
Jameson
Yes same issue here- it makes no sense because Amazon is already making ludicrous amounts of money off sellers who have to have them remove overstocked items because they are a measley 6 months old.
Hi @Seller_ww5gkPJboXQwU,
Thank you for reaching out on the Seller Forums! I apologize for the frustration this has caused.
If you haven't done so already, I would encourage you to read through the following help pages for additional guidance and best practices on both aged inventory surcharges and removal orders:
That said, if you'd like me to take a further look into any of your case IDs for additional guidance, I'd be happy to do so!
Thanks again,
Jameson
Hi @Seller_ww5gkPJboXQwU,
Thank you for reaching out on the Seller Forums! I apologize for the frustration this has caused.
If you haven't done so already, I would encourage you to read through the following help pages for additional guidance and best practices on both aged inventory surcharges and removal orders:
That said, if you'd like me to take a further look into any of your case IDs for additional guidance, I'd be happy to do so!
Thanks again,
Jameson
Yes same issue here- it makes no sense because Amazon is already making ludicrous amounts of money off sellers who have to have them remove overstocked items because they are a measley 6 months old.
Yes same issue here- it makes no sense because Amazon is already making ludicrous amounts of money off sellers who have to have them remove overstocked items because they are a measley 6 months old.