Seller Forums
user profile
News_Amazon

Prepaid return labels required for high-value items starting February 8


Effective February 8, 2026, all US sellers must use the Amazon Prepaid Return Label (APRL) program for customer returns regardless of item value. This change eliminates the previous high-value exemption to create a more consistent return experience for faster refund processing and reduced customer service requirements.

The APRL program automatically provides customers with prepaid return shipping labels through Buy Shipping Services. This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging.

Existing category exemptions will continue to apply, including Handmade, certified preowned watches, non-physical items, dangerous goods, and extra-large or heavy items. Additionally, items that are ineligible for prepaid return labels will remain exempt from this requirement.

We understand you may have concerns about high-value returns. When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program.

To learn more about how to file a SAFE-T claim, go to Reimbursement for seller-fulfilled orders.

For more information about the APRL program, go to Prepaid returns for seller-fulfilled orders.

2.6K views
109 replies
Tags:News and Announcements
0143
Reply
user profile
News_Amazon

Prepaid return labels required for high-value items starting February 8


Effective February 8, 2026, all US sellers must use the Amazon Prepaid Return Label (APRL) program for customer returns regardless of item value. This change eliminates the previous high-value exemption to create a more consistent return experience for faster refund processing and reduced customer service requirements.

The APRL program automatically provides customers with prepaid return shipping labels through Buy Shipping Services. This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging.

Existing category exemptions will continue to apply, including Handmade, certified preowned watches, non-physical items, dangerous goods, and extra-large or heavy items. Additionally, items that are ineligible for prepaid return labels will remain exempt from this requirement.

We understand you may have concerns about high-value returns. When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program.

To learn more about how to file a SAFE-T claim, go to Reimbursement for seller-fulfilled orders.

For more information about the APRL program, go to Prepaid returns for seller-fulfilled orders.

Tags:News and Announcements
0143
2.6K views
109 replies
Reply
109 replies
user profile
Seller_8ESHZD3bXlVUv
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

will Amazon include parcel insurance to account for the retail value of the item? right now prepaid labels only allow $100 of insurance.

440
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Noted, I have now disabled some items on Amazon that were not able to be sent back by prepaid label without excessive return label costs. Buyers who want those items can just buy them elsewhere.

730
user profile
Seller_r9wMm8LrE5iKj
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Geez, no news is good news around here.

"This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging." - Citation fricking needed.

"and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging" - If someone is going to return a high-value item, we sure want to be able to communicate how it needs to be shipped back in order to prevent damage. Are you saying you're removing this option entirely? It would be just like Amazon to announce termination of a necessary option in exactly this kind of wording.

"When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program." - Do you even know how your own platform works? You JUST made another announcement that all but eliminated the SAFE-T program. Also, this process was already broken, because the wording (and reality) of the process was always "Amazon MAY refund" ... if we wait for that to happen, we open ourselves to unwinnable A2Z's. If we don't, then no SAFE-T protections. And "believe it wasn't your fault" is NOT how the SAFE-T programs narrow protections work ... the wording on the return terms is "buyer CLAIMS seller error" which clearly is intended to promote shipping cost fraud by buyers (along with the wording on the returns page that's basically "to avoid paying shipping costs, choose a seller-fault reason").

This is going to cost some sellers a ton, because by shipping on their own label, they have a chance of winning a lost/damaged item claim with the shipper. That's nearly impossible on Amazon's label because of obstacles Amazon puts in the way of that process, then pretends does not exist (the except is those cases where it's literally impossible, because Amazon has made it so). I can enumerate the many places a shipping claim can not happen that are 100% Amazon's fault.

At a minimum, if you're going to force us to use YOUR labels on YOUR shipping account, take responsibility when those shipments go wrong. You can't say "it's our platform, so we'll take all the monies" and then say "it's not our platform when something goes wrong, take it up with the shipper, but we won't give you access to the things you need to make that happen." Or "Just file a claim" and "we've taken away claim filing." Or "We love you" and "here's a swift kick to the groin."

And while you're at it, go walk out into traffic. Your insistence that we can't do things as well as the platform that is openly and actively hostile to us is an insult. I don't know why we wouldn't consider you an awful, evil person for taking a paycheck from an awful, evil company.

1100
user profile
Seller_Okg41prvJzHxC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
user profile
Seller_3QIhzNaiqbTwC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

of course, the one tool we had to reduce frivolous returns and reduce returns costs is being eliminated.

The customer fraud and abuse will just continue to grow.

520
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
user profile
Seller_Ha6JyVvDK6Ybs
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Why not fix the false return codes who customers use? Amazon needs to either remove ASIN or FIX any listing which you allow customers to claim inaccurate website this is on you Amazon! Did Not Approve or Authorize this is also on Amazon as it is you Amazon who approved final transaction! So dealing with all this return shet crap stuff along with over charging on shipping labels which seems clear it only happens to bad customers who will say they did not get item our daily ebay pile of needs to be listed is way outpacing what we are doing on Amazon!

380
user profile
Seller_2srXkS44rN39i
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

"eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging". The worst part of selling on amazon is where a buyer can ship an item back without any friction. Ive gotten returns with "you didnt include the wireless dongle for the mouse". "Its in the slot inside the battery compartment"

"The cordless phone won't charge". "The batteries are shipped unplugged to prevent the discarged battery from beeping during shipment"

"this tastes funny"... "that can be expected, its shaped like a clown and is not intended for consumption" (ok, so that last one wasnt real)

360
user profile
Seller_LozVbcNSprfMf
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

This method will encourage more scammers to Amazon.

530
user profile
Seller_W6vNnb9Dv4v3c
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Nothing New as regards Amazon's interest and concern for small third party sellers They do not care one Bit as is obvious by the changes they have made in the past 5 to 10 years. For Example---Last Year the changes made to the "Manage All Inventory" page are disgraceful and Amazon made them over the objections of small third party sellers. Amazon has gone from a friendly partner to third party sellers, to the enemy of third party sellers. Thanks For Nothing Amazon!

230
user profile
News_Amazon

Prepaid return labels required for high-value items starting February 8


Effective February 8, 2026, all US sellers must use the Amazon Prepaid Return Label (APRL) program for customer returns regardless of item value. This change eliminates the previous high-value exemption to create a more consistent return experience for faster refund processing and reduced customer service requirements.

The APRL program automatically provides customers with prepaid return shipping labels through Buy Shipping Services. This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging.

Existing category exemptions will continue to apply, including Handmade, certified preowned watches, non-physical items, dangerous goods, and extra-large or heavy items. Additionally, items that are ineligible for prepaid return labels will remain exempt from this requirement.

We understand you may have concerns about high-value returns. When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program.

To learn more about how to file a SAFE-T claim, go to Reimbursement for seller-fulfilled orders.

For more information about the APRL program, go to Prepaid returns for seller-fulfilled orders.

2.6K views
109 replies
Tags:News and Announcements
0143
Reply
user profile
News_Amazon

Prepaid return labels required for high-value items starting February 8


Effective February 8, 2026, all US sellers must use the Amazon Prepaid Return Label (APRL) program for customer returns regardless of item value. This change eliminates the previous high-value exemption to create a more consistent return experience for faster refund processing and reduced customer service requirements.

The APRL program automatically provides customers with prepaid return shipping labels through Buy Shipping Services. This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging.

Existing category exemptions will continue to apply, including Handmade, certified preowned watches, non-physical items, dangerous goods, and extra-large or heavy items. Additionally, items that are ineligible for prepaid return labels will remain exempt from this requirement.

We understand you may have concerns about high-value returns. When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program.

To learn more about how to file a SAFE-T claim, go to Reimbursement for seller-fulfilled orders.

For more information about the APRL program, go to Prepaid returns for seller-fulfilled orders.

Tags:News and Announcements
0143
2.6K views
109 replies
Reply
user profile

Prepaid return labels required for high-value items starting February 8

by News_Amazon


Effective February 8, 2026, all US sellers must use the Amazon Prepaid Return Label (APRL) program for customer returns regardless of item value. This change eliminates the previous high-value exemption to create a more consistent return experience for faster refund processing and reduced customer service requirements.

The APRL program automatically provides customers with prepaid return shipping labels through Buy Shipping Services. This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging.

Existing category exemptions will continue to apply, including Handmade, certified preowned watches, non-physical items, dangerous goods, and extra-large or heavy items. Additionally, items that are ineligible for prepaid return labels will remain exempt from this requirement.

We understand you may have concerns about high-value returns. When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program.

To learn more about how to file a SAFE-T claim, go to Reimbursement for seller-fulfilled orders.

For more information about the APRL program, go to Prepaid returns for seller-fulfilled orders.

Tags:News and Announcements
0143
2.6K views
109 replies
Reply
109 replies
109 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Seller_8ESHZD3bXlVUv
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

will Amazon include parcel insurance to account for the retail value of the item? right now prepaid labels only allow $100 of insurance.

440
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Noted, I have now disabled some items on Amazon that were not able to be sent back by prepaid label without excessive return label costs. Buyers who want those items can just buy them elsewhere.

730
user profile
Seller_r9wMm8LrE5iKj
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Geez, no news is good news around here.

"This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging." - Citation fricking needed.

"and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging" - If someone is going to return a high-value item, we sure want to be able to communicate how it needs to be shipped back in order to prevent damage. Are you saying you're removing this option entirely? It would be just like Amazon to announce termination of a necessary option in exactly this kind of wording.

"When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program." - Do you even know how your own platform works? You JUST made another announcement that all but eliminated the SAFE-T program. Also, this process was already broken, because the wording (and reality) of the process was always "Amazon MAY refund" ... if we wait for that to happen, we open ourselves to unwinnable A2Z's. If we don't, then no SAFE-T protections. And "believe it wasn't your fault" is NOT how the SAFE-T programs narrow protections work ... the wording on the return terms is "buyer CLAIMS seller error" which clearly is intended to promote shipping cost fraud by buyers (along with the wording on the returns page that's basically "to avoid paying shipping costs, choose a seller-fault reason").

This is going to cost some sellers a ton, because by shipping on their own label, they have a chance of winning a lost/damaged item claim with the shipper. That's nearly impossible on Amazon's label because of obstacles Amazon puts in the way of that process, then pretends does not exist (the except is those cases where it's literally impossible, because Amazon has made it so). I can enumerate the many places a shipping claim can not happen that are 100% Amazon's fault.

At a minimum, if you're going to force us to use YOUR labels on YOUR shipping account, take responsibility when those shipments go wrong. You can't say "it's our platform, so we'll take all the monies" and then say "it's not our platform when something goes wrong, take it up with the shipper, but we won't give you access to the things you need to make that happen." Or "Just file a claim" and "we've taken away claim filing." Or "We love you" and "here's a swift kick to the groin."

And while you're at it, go walk out into traffic. Your insistence that we can't do things as well as the platform that is openly and actively hostile to us is an insult. I don't know why we wouldn't consider you an awful, evil person for taking a paycheck from an awful, evil company.

1100
user profile
Seller_Okg41prvJzHxC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
user profile
Seller_3QIhzNaiqbTwC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

of course, the one tool we had to reduce frivolous returns and reduce returns costs is being eliminated.

The customer fraud and abuse will just continue to grow.

520
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
user profile
Seller_Ha6JyVvDK6Ybs
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Why not fix the false return codes who customers use? Amazon needs to either remove ASIN or FIX any listing which you allow customers to claim inaccurate website this is on you Amazon! Did Not Approve or Authorize this is also on Amazon as it is you Amazon who approved final transaction! So dealing with all this return shet crap stuff along with over charging on shipping labels which seems clear it only happens to bad customers who will say they did not get item our daily ebay pile of needs to be listed is way outpacing what we are doing on Amazon!

380
user profile
Seller_2srXkS44rN39i
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

"eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging". The worst part of selling on amazon is where a buyer can ship an item back without any friction. Ive gotten returns with "you didnt include the wireless dongle for the mouse". "Its in the slot inside the battery compartment"

"The cordless phone won't charge". "The batteries are shipped unplugged to prevent the discarged battery from beeping during shipment"

"this tastes funny"... "that can be expected, its shaped like a clown and is not intended for consumption" (ok, so that last one wasnt real)

360
user profile
Seller_LozVbcNSprfMf
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

This method will encourage more scammers to Amazon.

530
user profile
Seller_W6vNnb9Dv4v3c
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Nothing New as regards Amazon's interest and concern for small third party sellers They do not care one Bit as is obvious by the changes they have made in the past 5 to 10 years. For Example---Last Year the changes made to the "Manage All Inventory" page are disgraceful and Amazon made them over the objections of small third party sellers. Amazon has gone from a friendly partner to third party sellers, to the enemy of third party sellers. Thanks For Nothing Amazon!

230
user profile
Seller_8ESHZD3bXlVUv
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

will Amazon include parcel insurance to account for the retail value of the item? right now prepaid labels only allow $100 of insurance.

440
user profile
Seller_8ESHZD3bXlVUv
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

will Amazon include parcel insurance to account for the retail value of the item? right now prepaid labels only allow $100 of insurance.

440
Reply
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Noted, I have now disabled some items on Amazon that were not able to be sent back by prepaid label without excessive return label costs. Buyers who want those items can just buy them elsewhere.

730
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Noted, I have now disabled some items on Amazon that were not able to be sent back by prepaid label without excessive return label costs. Buyers who want those items can just buy them elsewhere.

730
Reply
user profile
Seller_r9wMm8LrE5iKj
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Geez, no news is good news around here.

"This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging." - Citation fricking needed.

"and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging" - If someone is going to return a high-value item, we sure want to be able to communicate how it needs to be shipped back in order to prevent damage. Are you saying you're removing this option entirely? It would be just like Amazon to announce termination of a necessary option in exactly this kind of wording.

"When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program." - Do you even know how your own platform works? You JUST made another announcement that all but eliminated the SAFE-T program. Also, this process was already broken, because the wording (and reality) of the process was always "Amazon MAY refund" ... if we wait for that to happen, we open ourselves to unwinnable A2Z's. If we don't, then no SAFE-T protections. And "believe it wasn't your fault" is NOT how the SAFE-T programs narrow protections work ... the wording on the return terms is "buyer CLAIMS seller error" which clearly is intended to promote shipping cost fraud by buyers (along with the wording on the returns page that's basically "to avoid paying shipping costs, choose a seller-fault reason").

This is going to cost some sellers a ton, because by shipping on their own label, they have a chance of winning a lost/damaged item claim with the shipper. That's nearly impossible on Amazon's label because of obstacles Amazon puts in the way of that process, then pretends does not exist (the except is those cases where it's literally impossible, because Amazon has made it so). I can enumerate the many places a shipping claim can not happen that are 100% Amazon's fault.

At a minimum, if you're going to force us to use YOUR labels on YOUR shipping account, take responsibility when those shipments go wrong. You can't say "it's our platform, so we'll take all the monies" and then say "it's not our platform when something goes wrong, take it up with the shipper, but we won't give you access to the things you need to make that happen." Or "Just file a claim" and "we've taken away claim filing." Or "We love you" and "here's a swift kick to the groin."

And while you're at it, go walk out into traffic. Your insistence that we can't do things as well as the platform that is openly and actively hostile to us is an insult. I don't know why we wouldn't consider you an awful, evil person for taking a paycheck from an awful, evil company.

1100
user profile
Seller_r9wMm8LrE5iKj
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Geez, no news is good news around here.

"This streamlined process reduces the refund cycle time from 14 to 7 days and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging." - Citation fricking needed.

"and eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging" - If someone is going to return a high-value item, we sure want to be able to communicate how it needs to be shipped back in order to prevent damage. Are you saying you're removing this option entirely? It would be just like Amazon to announce termination of a necessary option in exactly this kind of wording.

"When we issue a refund to a buyer and you believe it wasn't your fault, you can file a claim for reimbursement through the Seller Assurance for E-Commerce Transactions (SAFE-T) program." - Do you even know how your own platform works? You JUST made another announcement that all but eliminated the SAFE-T program. Also, this process was already broken, because the wording (and reality) of the process was always "Amazon MAY refund" ... if we wait for that to happen, we open ourselves to unwinnable A2Z's. If we don't, then no SAFE-T protections. And "believe it wasn't your fault" is NOT how the SAFE-T programs narrow protections work ... the wording on the return terms is "buyer CLAIMS seller error" which clearly is intended to promote shipping cost fraud by buyers (along with the wording on the returns page that's basically "to avoid paying shipping costs, choose a seller-fault reason").

This is going to cost some sellers a ton, because by shipping on their own label, they have a chance of winning a lost/damaged item claim with the shipper. That's nearly impossible on Amazon's label because of obstacles Amazon puts in the way of that process, then pretends does not exist (the except is those cases where it's literally impossible, because Amazon has made it so). I can enumerate the many places a shipping claim can not happen that are 100% Amazon's fault.

At a minimum, if you're going to force us to use YOUR labels on YOUR shipping account, take responsibility when those shipments go wrong. You can't say "it's our platform, so we'll take all the monies" and then say "it's not our platform when something goes wrong, take it up with the shipper, but we won't give you access to the things you need to make that happen." Or "Just file a claim" and "we've taken away claim filing." Or "We love you" and "here's a swift kick to the groin."

And while you're at it, go walk out into traffic. Your insistence that we can't do things as well as the platform that is openly and actively hostile to us is an insult. I don't know why we wouldn't consider you an awful, evil person for taking a paycheck from an awful, evil company.

1100
Reply
user profile
Seller_Okg41prvJzHxC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
user profile
Seller_Okg41prvJzHxC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_3QIhzNaiqbTwC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

of course, the one tool we had to reduce frivolous returns and reduce returns costs is being eliminated.

The customer fraud and abuse will just continue to grow.

520
user profile
Seller_3QIhzNaiqbTwC
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

of course, the one tool we had to reduce frivolous returns and reduce returns costs is being eliminated.

The customer fraud and abuse will just continue to grow.

520
Reply
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
user profile
Seller_DdmPiA1p1S2Wu
In reply to: News_Amazon's post
This post has been deleted
00
Reply
user profile
Seller_Ha6JyVvDK6Ybs
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Why not fix the false return codes who customers use? Amazon needs to either remove ASIN or FIX any listing which you allow customers to claim inaccurate website this is on you Amazon! Did Not Approve or Authorize this is also on Amazon as it is you Amazon who approved final transaction! So dealing with all this return shet crap stuff along with over charging on shipping labels which seems clear it only happens to bad customers who will say they did not get item our daily ebay pile of needs to be listed is way outpacing what we are doing on Amazon!

380
user profile
Seller_Ha6JyVvDK6Ybs
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Why not fix the false return codes who customers use? Amazon needs to either remove ASIN or FIX any listing which you allow customers to claim inaccurate website this is on you Amazon! Did Not Approve or Authorize this is also on Amazon as it is you Amazon who approved final transaction! So dealing with all this return shet crap stuff along with over charging on shipping labels which seems clear it only happens to bad customers who will say they did not get item our daily ebay pile of needs to be listed is way outpacing what we are doing on Amazon!

380
Reply
user profile
Seller_2srXkS44rN39i
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

"eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging". The worst part of selling on amazon is where a buyer can ship an item back without any friction. Ive gotten returns with "you didnt include the wireless dongle for the mouse". "Its in the slot inside the battery compartment"

"The cordless phone won't charge". "The batteries are shipped unplugged to prevent the discarged battery from beeping during shipment"

"this tastes funny"... "that can be expected, its shaped like a clown and is not intended for consumption" (ok, so that last one wasnt real)

360
user profile
Seller_2srXkS44rN39i
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

"eliminates the need for buyer-seller messaging". The worst part of selling on amazon is where a buyer can ship an item back without any friction. Ive gotten returns with "you didnt include the wireless dongle for the mouse". "Its in the slot inside the battery compartment"

"The cordless phone won't charge". "The batteries are shipped unplugged to prevent the discarged battery from beeping during shipment"

"this tastes funny"... "that can be expected, its shaped like a clown and is not intended for consumption" (ok, so that last one wasnt real)

360
Reply
user profile
Seller_LozVbcNSprfMf
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

This method will encourage more scammers to Amazon.

530
user profile
Seller_LozVbcNSprfMf
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

This method will encourage more scammers to Amazon.

530
Reply
user profile
Seller_W6vNnb9Dv4v3c
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Nothing New as regards Amazon's interest and concern for small third party sellers They do not care one Bit as is obvious by the changes they have made in the past 5 to 10 years. For Example---Last Year the changes made to the "Manage All Inventory" page are disgraceful and Amazon made them over the objections of small third party sellers. Amazon has gone from a friendly partner to third party sellers, to the enemy of third party sellers. Thanks For Nothing Amazon!

230
user profile
Seller_W6vNnb9Dv4v3c
In reply to: News_Amazon's post

Nothing New as regards Amazon's interest and concern for small third party sellers They do not care one Bit as is obvious by the changes they have made in the past 5 to 10 years. For Example---Last Year the changes made to the "Manage All Inventory" page are disgraceful and Amazon made them over the objections of small third party sellers. Amazon has gone from a friendly partner to third party sellers, to the enemy of third party sellers. Thanks For Nothing Amazon!

230
Reply