In full agreement with that. The most enticing part of a seller is really the low price. That factor seems to be undeniably what sells.
That’s even better than one I found with only 3 feedback and 2 of them negative. Both said the person never shipped the item.
Not yet. I was tempted but I do not want anybody find the Seller in google using the text of the feedback and alert Amazon that way.
I really want to see when Amazon finds this one on their own, and as for the Buyers, at this point I do not feel sorry for them.
Seller has 0 percent positive feedback indeed - but if potential Buyers click on the number, they will see that it is not a single unfortunate negative but a stream of negatives, up to 9 for now, starting April 11.
Very very pure. Not a single fake positive from a neighbor or a relative LOL.
Yet they are still going … I renamed them in my mind The Energizer Bunny.
I wonder if they already got some money and they are still hoping for more.
Obviously their ODR is so off the chart that it was not even programmed by the programmers to alert the ODR police!
I promise to post their link as soon as they get suspended “spontaneously” by Amazon or wither away on their own for lack of sales due to their stellar feedback, but not just yet.
261 Active Listings right now so buyers are either still buying or they closed a few since this morning - they had two hundred and seventy four I think. More than 270 anyway but less than 280.
there are 2 with 0% positive lol
IMHO, they didn’t disappear fast enough.
At least OP is CONCERNED, and making an effort to do the right thing by his customers.
Kudos to him for that.
Just so sad that such a seller can survive long enough to rip off many customers; you know,
if nine left negatives, there’s probably 90 more who just didn’t know how, or don’t think it’s effective, or whatever, but still, 90 more unhappy buyers.
Ouch, his days are not numbered, his hours are. So feast on the seller while he disappears before our eyes.
Perhaps the system has no formula whereby one can err in excess within a short amount of time. ha! Hilarious.
Some simple fast math based on 9 negative feedbacks and 0 positives.
They have had 8 negatives in the last 30 days.
For their metrics to be within the acceptable 1% ODR, they would have had over 900 transaction without any chargebacks or A to Z claims. That would leave 891 transaction that have yet to leave feedback… of which none of those 891 has yet to positive feedback.
I know most buyers don’t leave feedback, but those numbers are hard to believe.
Yes, but one does not count, that is a single stale negative from half a year ago and he only has one listing up, expensive though.
That is why I am saying that their ODR is probably so off the chart that the ODR police programs do not even pick it up!
Short term ODR is calculated in 60 days, not 30 and there is a time delay (look at your metrics today) of about two weeks in the denominator, only one or two days in the numerator of that algorithm.
Although how hard could that be?
It should be a number between 0 and 100, closer to 100 I would think than to 1 percent LOL but definitely higher than 1 percent.
If they only had the 9 sales, it would be 100 times 9/9 = 100, if they had a few more sales than nine, it would probably still be much higher than one percent.
But in reality they could come up with a number higher than 100 percent and this is how:
As there is a two week time lag between the numerator and the denominator, there could be more negatives than the total sales counted - and this might just be the case here.
Let us say one of those negatives or perhaps even more are from longer than 70 days ago sale, the negative just came in, but the sale is no longer counted in short term ODR.
So strange things can happen with such edge effects when a seller is just starting up - and the total sales are not at the approximate continuous level in the sliding windows.
So maybe their ODR is even higher than 100 percent in the Short Term window and this is why the system did not pick it up - because it is programmed to “think” that the number is 100 at its highest value.
The seller of interest is listing a $450 engagement ring in the Toys category.
I did not even look at the details.
In a way I ruined my own game, because I realized that I could not show the feedback after the suspend the seller - even now, while they are active, there is no See More Information About this Seller Link (that link comes and goes lately from SP storefronts) and they would remove that link anyway after they suspend the seller.
So I decided that I wanted others to see -while we could all see together.
Otherwise I could just publish it from my copied files, I think.
But perhaps I hastened their fate with this if Ask Amazon Admins pick up on this or somebody decides to officially report them before they evaporate.
OK, I will look in more details at their wonderful storefront offerings while I can.
I would think that they are from some faraway land, but they may have a US return address, as one of the feedbacks mentioned return but they did not complain about the distance, only the sluggishness of the refund.
Amazon did not budge for days, since I first noticed them. Now we perhaps hastened their demise.
Toy Engagement Ring? The should accompany it with a book “How to deal with divorce as a toddler.” sheesh
Check it out. It was on Page 10 of said seller, Currently Unavailable but I still could click through it to the page on Amazon.
I think they are fading out now, their listings started to become Currently Unavailable.
But you probably can still find that Engagement Ring in toys, others listed it also at weirdly different prices.
And we will feel guilty about it for .000001 seconds.
Never say you’ve seen it all around here, because there is always some seller that is striving to reach the bottom the shortest amount of time and in new and depressing ways.
Apparently those are Toy Engagement rings, one reviewer even wrote that she is going to use them (in plural) on cupcakes for her daughter’s engagement party.
You could get some for 5 dollars each with Prime but two hopefuls list their own similar engagement rings, one Used for 1200 dollars, another Collectible for 1000, both Just Launched Storefronts.
What are they even thinking? to list their 1200 dollar used engagement ring on a five dollar toy ring page???
The 450 dollar listing is now gone, perhaps someone thought it was a good deal compared to the 1000 and 1200 dollars.
I might just get the 1200 dollar barely used one and file a claim that it is not the 5 dollar toy as described - of course it is possible that they send out the exact same 5 dollar toy what is described on the page to the buyer who pays up 1200!!!
Last time I checked on the seller, only the Toshiba was in the storefront.
Well that was fast.
Watch for a new thread: “suspended for NO reason, please help!”