user profile
Sign in
user profile

Sales Tax Rhode Island?

by Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt

Just received this email:

"Under a new Rhode Island state law, Amazon is required to disclose to the Rhode Island tax authority the following information about sellers who made sales to Rhode Island customers in 2017:

Seller contact information (name and address).
To comply with this obligation, we plan to provide your information to the Rhode Island Department of Revenue by February 15, 2018."

Was I supposed to be collecting sales tax for RI? Our Nexus is in CA. I’ve only specified to collect in CA.

Tags: Address, Taxes
10
288 views
21 replies
Reply
21 replies
Quick filters
Sort by
user profile
Seller_jglZowc8rO988
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post
Reply
00
user profile
Seller_R6Gq3bwrsmfky
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

Business Reports is going to need a new category. “Sales By State,” or is this category already available and I just can’t find it?

Reply
20
user profile
Seller_GRod9SW05FOSP
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

I’m guessing RI is wanting names & addresses of RI residents who made purchases outside of RI. Easier to collect from residents than non-resident sellers. RI will likely wait to see if residents fill use tax returns and if not, send out notices based on info. collected from out of state sellers.

Reply
10
user profile
Seller_GRod9SW05FOSP
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

On the other hand, if Amazon was required to collect sales tax on RI sales, and they didn’t, why not?

Reply
00
user profile
Seller_ATJxcmyKzHVAt
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

That doesn’t seem so clear to me Funky. Take a look at this article:

Quoting from it:

In his opinion, Justice Kennedy wrote that it was time to reconsider the 1992 Quill vs. North Dakota Supreme Court decision, which opponents of e-fairness usually cite when arguing that states have no right to require remote sellers to collect and remit sales tax unless those sellers have a physical presence in the state.

Looks like things are starting to change real fast.

Reply
00
user profile
Seller_NaLYWaRmGV6a0
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

From the research I did, seems to me there are NO fulfillment centers in RI, so businesses can NOT be considered a business nexuses in that state. If so, why would I be required to charge sales tax to customers in RI? I have nothing to do with the state!

Does anyone know where you can download a report of your sales by state?

Reply
00
user profile
Seller_dQMcrndKNbHN9
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

The Rhode Island tax law only requires online sellers to collect sales tax if their income exceeds $1,000,000.

Reply
00
user profile
Seller_2Yq25jnZGh9QV
In reply to: Seller_BXeX1sENNF4Yt's post

http://www.tax.state.ri.us/notice/FAQs%20on%20non-collecting%20retailer%20notices%20--%2002-02-18.pdf

Straight from Rhode Island’s website. They don’t care if you have a Nexus in their state or not.

It will be interesting because their law contradicts Quill vs North Dakota

We abide by our state law of collecting taxes in the state we operate in as that is the only Nexus we have. How one state can set up a law that goes against another states law will be an interesting argument in a Federal Court.

Reply
00
There are no more posts to display
Go to original post

Similar Discussions