Asking for a mod to escalate this to someone who can fix it.
I now have several "Suspected Intellectual Property Violations" for "Trademark Misuse" of the brand name "Mega Construx." This is because someone changed the brand name attribute to "Mega Brands." If you don't know, these are the same thing. Mattel owns both of these brand names. The original brand name was "Mega Bloks," which they still use for their bigger brick toys aimed at younger kids, and they used "Mega Construx" for a few years and now they are changing their brand to just "Mega" for their main line of brick toys, all under the umbrella of "Mega Brands." The main point here is that it is all the same company, owned by Mattel.
I have a case open for this issue, #17460435981 for ASIN B075182VJP. (I also have the same "violation" for ASINs B0794K61QW and B07YT798DT, although I'm sure there are many more ASINs affected.) They keep telling me that the two brand names, "Mega Construx" and "Mega Brands," are registered separately in brand registry, and that I need to "Share a letter of authorization or licensing agreement proving that you're authorized by the rights owner to create and list products using [INSERT PROTECTED BRAND NAME] trademarked term." (I guess they couldn't decide which brand name to insert there.) Of course, the system is not asking for a licensing agreement between me (or any other 3rd party seller) and Mega Brands, it is asking for a licensing agreement between Mega Brands and Mega Construx, which does not exist because they are the same company.
There is no violation here. Someone at Amazon just needs to update their database to understand that these are the same company, and allow the term "Mega Construx" to be used in listings where the brand name attribute is "Mega Brands," and vice-versa.